Supper at Emmaus

 Rembrandt (1606-1669) painted Supper at Emmaus in 1648. It is also one of several paintings he painted of this scene. The Emmaus Road account was one of Rembrandt’s favourites and one which he revisited several times over the span of his career, more so in the period where his commissions had slowed. The painting in this study was painted in this later period and may have been in Rembrandt’s mind as a piece to be sold in the open market.

1. Compare and contrast the two paintings: what is similar and what is different? Pay attention to painting style, the composition in terms of how the scenes are arranged, what each person is doing (body language, gestures, facial expressions), contrasts between light and dark, and colour.

Caravaggio depicts Christ as he raises his right hand to bless the yet unbroken bread, with the two disciples recognizing him and the innkeeper looking on.

Rembrandt alsodepicts Jesus with the two disciples just at the point they realize who he is. The boy serving looks on, seemingly oblivious. The depiction is of a humble and ordinary everyday scene but light emanates from the risen Jesus, the extraordinary in this scene.

2. Look again at the Caravaggio. What do you consider the role of the different items of food and drink on the table to be? If these are symbolic, what do they represent in relation to the Emmaus account?

Not only are there the blood and water presented which Christ had shed, but also the fruit is significant. The bunch of grapes echoes the wine, the apples perhaps connote the Fall and the pomegranate alludes to the crown of thorns. The focus is on the symbolism within the picture, which makes it something of an iconographical piece. This is an overtly Counter Reformation painting where Christ is connected with the bread, echoing the Roman Catholic doctrine of transubstantiation (the bread becomes the very body of Christ when blessed by the Priest).

3. Rembrandt’s depiction is bereft of similar details, but Jesus is depicted with a halo and is emanating light. What do you think this is communicating? How does this contrast with Caravaggio’s portrayal of Jesus?

With Rembrandt Christ is presented as the Light of the World, one who removes spiritual darkness and enables us to see God. Very much more an Immanuel – God with us.

4. Both paintings depict the moment of recognition by the disciples that it was the risen Jesus. This happens in slightly different places in the narrative according to each painting. How do Caravaggio and Rembrandt then ultimately read (or interpret) the meal at Emmaus? What is their respective overall take on what was happening?

With Caravaggio Christ is presented as the one in whom we participate through the Eucharist, the Lamb of God bringing redemption from the Fall through his sufferings.

For Rembrandt, in contrast, the scene depicted seems to be much more about the inner spiritual experience. The scene is much emptier of objects but it is the light, primarily emanating from Christ, which is of significance here. The light signals the recognition of the disciples at the table, the dawning recognition that this is the same Christ, yet risen. Moreover, the light reflects the way in which Christ, the Light of the world, sheds light on humanity’s inner spiritual darkness.

Final questions

1. How does this Emmaus road episode help you in your understanding of who Jesus is?

2. When you go back to the Bible text again, have these two paintings represented it in a good manner?

3. A key theme in this passage is revelation and the opening of our eyes. How do both of these function in our lives?

4. Try to place yourself in the shoes of one of the disciples with Jesus that day. What do you think it would have been like? Has your heart ever ‘burnt within’ you when seeking God in prayer, Bible study, a sermon or some other worship context? If so, what happened?

This study is prepared by Richard Evans, student at Regent College, Vanvouver B.C., Canada.

Rembrandt

5 thoughts on “Rembrandt’s Supper at Emmaus

  1. L.L. Monday, April 9, 2012 at 9:25 am

    Although I’m a great admirer of Rembrandt’s skill as a painter I don’t think he had any idea of the features of a jewish carpenter/builder, who after his resurrection was mistaken for, among others, the gardener. John 20:14-16, Mark 16: 12,13, Luke 24: 13-32, 36-43 and John 20: 19-20.
    http://www.askelm.com/secrets/sec103.htm
    Isaiah wrote: And he will come up like a twig before one, and like a root out of waterless land. No stately form does he have, nor any splendor; and when we shall see him, there is not the appearance so that we should desire him.
    He was despised and was avoided by men, a man meant for pains and for having acquaintance with sickness. And there was as if the concealing of one’s face from us. He was despised, and we held him as of no account. Truly our sicknesses were what he himself carried; and as for our pains, he bore them. But we ourselves accounted him as plagued, stricken by God and afflicted. But he was being pierced for our transgression; he was being crushed for our errors. The chastisement meant for our peace was upon him, and because of his wounds there has been a healing for us.
Tung Thanh Tung

 Supper at Emmaus (Caravaggio, London)
The Supper at Emmaus is a painting by the Italian Baroque master Caravaggio, executed in 1601, and now in the National Gallery in London. Originally this painting was commissioned and paid for by Ciriaco Mattei, brother of cardinal Girolamo Mattei.

The painting depicts the moment when the resurrected but incognito Jesus, reveals himself to two of his disciples (presumed to be Luke and Cleopas) in the town of Emmaus, only to soon vanish from their sight (Gospel of Luke 24: 30-31). Cleopas wears the scallop shell of a pilgrim. The other apostle wears torn clothes. Cleopas gesticulates in a perspectively-challenging extension of arms in and out of the frame of reference. The standing groom, forehead smooth and face in darkness, appears oblivious to the event. The painting is unusual for the life-sized figures, the dark and blank background. The table lays out a still-life meal. Like the world these apostles knew, the basket of food teeters perilously over the edge.

See More

Welcome to the Mauritshuis website. The Mauritshuis is home to the very best of Dutch Golden Age painting. The compact, yet world-renowned collection, is…
mauritshuis.nl

 Supper at Emmaus (Caravaggio, London)

Artist
Caravaggio

Year
1601

Medium
Oil on canvas

Dimensions
141 cm × 196.2 cm (56 in × 77.2 in)

Location
National Gallery, London

Questions

1. Briefly discuss your initial responses.

2. Identify what’s going on in this passage:

a. What are main events?

b. Who is present in the passage?

c. How is Jesus presented?

3. What key themes do you see in this passage?

4. In what ways does the meal at Emmaus echo the Last Supper?

The paintings If possible, project the paintings onto a large screen, a computer or television screen. Or look the paintings up in a book. Take a few minutes to look at each painting in silence. Do not discuss them immediately. Throughout the study questions will be posed in black, while answers are rendered in blue. With each question take time to reflect and discuss before you read the explanatory blue passages.

1024px-1602-3_Caravaggio,Supper_at_Emmaus_National_Gallery,_London.jpg

References:

IMG_1138

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s